RED News

From Constructed Worlds Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RED News
RED News logo.svg
Logo used since 1997
Country Liberta
Broadcast area Domestic
America
Southern Europe
Africa
Network RED Broadcasting
Headquarters Rogue Media Building, Hollice, Eode
Programming
Picture format 720p (16:9 HDTV)
Ownership
Parent Rogue Media
Key people Marc Roberts (Executive chairman)
Sister channels RED
RED Finance Network
RED Weather
History
Launched February 14, 1997; 27 years ago (1997-02-14)
Founder Marc Roberts
Jason Tilius
Links
Website rednews.com
Availability

RED News is a Libertan multinational populist news and political commentary television channel and website based in Eode, Liberta. It is owned by Rogue Media and is among the most popular television channels in Liberta and English-speaking Africa. Started as a sister channel to the entertainment-focused channel RED, it has seen immense success among a domestic working-class audience and later in a diverse South African and Nigerian audience.

RED News was launched in early 1997, modeled after the conservative American television channel Fox News. Though initially only intended for a Libertan audience, the success of sister channel RED in Africa incentivized further expansion by RED News. The channel has since risen to become among the most popular television channels in South Africa, Nigeria, and Ghana. Despite a majority black audience in Africa, the channel is especially popular among Afrikaners. The channel is generally regarded as populist and broadly conservative. Despite its generally right-leaning content, the channel has become a mouthpiece of the South African opposition due to its hostility to the state-owned SABC. In South Africa, the network is available in English, Afrikaans, Xhosa, and Zulu depending on the region.

The channel has stirred numerous controversies, both in Liberta and abroad. It has been accused of political bias, using sensationalist tactics, and providing chairman Marc Roberts with widespread political influence. Its hosts have been described as provocative, using informal fallacies, and deliberately misrepresenting its interviewees.

History

Political alignment

Outlets

Ratings and reception

Content

Controversies

See also

References